Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Eyes Wide Open

Two weeks ago, I participated in a "Learn to Meditate" course at the Shambhala Mountain Center outside of Ft. Collins, Colorado. One day, I hope to be able to look back at this weekend and identify it as a turning point.

I have a great life, am generally happy and healthy, and don't really feel the need for a dramatic external shift in direction. But I'm looking for something more, some internal direction, something concrete regarding my purpose in this ever-shortening life. Problem is, I have a real problem trusting anybody who claims to have "It" all figured out. My sense is that "It" must be at once so paradigm-shiftingly profound yet so simple as to be accessible to me this instant without any further training or guidance, and yet for some reason "It" is still invisible to me and pretty much everyone else on earth. How can that be?

I'm not ever expecting to find the "right" answer, the One True Church, the secret password that will let me pierce the veil, or to experience an orgiastic moment of life-altering enlightenment. I'm simply hoping that, from the rubble of my prior Mormon faith, from the thrill and agoraphobia of this new life without obvious spiritual boundaries, I can find something solid enough to build a life upon and raise a family, and to have it all mean something before I kick the bucket in another forty-five years or so, barring, of course, our assimilation by machines.

For a long time, I've been craving spiritual wisdom, delivered by a good-hearted mentor who walks the walk. I think I found one at Shambhala Mountain Center: Greg Smith, our meditation teacher. Greg, with a quintessential American name, is anything but typical. He is a Buddhist artist who lives at the foot of the Great Stupa (Buddhist temple) that is the resplendent, totally unexpected jewel of the Center, tucked away at the far end of the land among some pine covered hills. Greg has lived there for decades, and in fact painted most of the interior panels of the Stupa. He has a calm, kindly, assured demeanor. He looks like the guy you'd want to teach you how to meditate.
The course was Friday afternoon to Sunday afternoon. I chose to stay on site in a "monk room." (Note: not a "monkey room", which may have been more fun but less enlightening.) The monk room is small: a bed, four walls, one window, two lamps, and no decor. A shared bathroom. No TV, phone or other distractions.

But being a modern sort of Buddhist center, they do have wi-fi. My first choice of the weekend was, embarrassingly, one of the hardest: should I turn off my phone? I was expecting a few important emails, and what if my wife had to reach me? But after pondering the decision an absurdly long time, I called Elizabeth one last time, told her I'd call her again on Sunday afternoon on the way home, said goodnight to the kiddos, and then I shut the darn thing off, which is what perhaps made possible everything else that was to happen that weekend. I was here to learn to calm my mind, and I wanted to get my money's worth, which required shutting off the constant flow of distraction that emanated from my phone. There was a real sense of withdrawal the first night: not checking my email, not feeling the buzz on my hip that gave me the sense that I was important, that I needed to be instantly accessible to people, that I could find the answer to any possible question within seconds. But once my hands stopped shaking and I stopped sweating, I settled into the blissful feeling of being unplugged, maybe for the first time in years. Maybe now there would be some space in which my mind and spirit could breathe.

I reported to the dining hall for dinner. The food all weekend was healthy and tasty. I met my fellow meditation classmates. Felt an instant bond. These seemed like my tribe: seekers, westerners, educated, a handful of doctors and nurses, middle-aged, looking for truth, open-minded yet appropriately skeptical. And mostly nice, good-hearted, altogether decent human beings.

From there we went to meet Greg and his assistant teacher, Margo, in the Sacred Studies Hall, a large room with wood floors and ample windows offering views of the snowy pine-covered hills. In the middle was an ornate stand with flowers, candles, and portraits of the two Buddhist teachers, a father and son, who, I was to learn, are the guiding lights of Shambhala Buddhism. There was an empty chair next to the stand, symbolizing their enduring presence, and then another chair for the current teacher, and next to it a meditation cushion. Arranged in three rows in the center of the floor were twenty-five other Gomden meditation cushions--cloth-covered foam blocks--resting on padded meditation mats.

The first order of business was learning the proper posture and mechanics for meditation. That seemed like a small thing at first, but by the end of the weekend, I realized how vital it was. Meditation takes physical stamina. I learned to stack another cushion on my Gomden so that when sitting cross-legged my knees would fall below my hips. This one trick saved my spine. Ankles crossed, hands on thighs, pelvis rolled forward to stack the vertebrae appropriately. And then, surprise . . . eyes remain open.

This one threw me, but I soon learned the true power of it. My previous conception of meditation was invariably with eyes closed. How else to still your mind from the constant visual distractions? How else to escape to that elusive place of stillness? Eyes closed is the type of meditation that I do in shavasana after yoga, and I love it. More of an escape from my mind. But this was shamatha meditation, a different style, different purpose. Not an escape but a present mindfulness, and a mindful presentness. Or as they term it, peaceful abiding.

With peaceful abiding, the goal is to acknowledge, and then let go, of all of the baser functions of the mind, those aspects of consciousness that dwell on what to cook for dinner, or feel regret for something that happened in the past, or fret endlessly about what may happen tomorrow or in twenty years. The goal is actually goal-less. You get past your need for something specific to happen, or some ambition or fantasy to come to fruition. But it's real. It's grounded in the present. You don't suppress any thoughts, but neither do you indulge them. We did dozens of meditations, and I couldn't always get to that diamond of stillness at the center of my mind, but I often could. It would last for a few minutes, and yet paradoxically in that few minutes, time ceased to really matter. Time was just another artifact of my consciousness's preoccupation with this thing we call our life. When I got to that serene, goal-less place, a range of subtle physical sensations became noticeable: a quality of rich light that flooded the periphery of my vision, a pleasant tingling of the skin of my scalp, a tangible sense of muscle relaxation.

In this type of meditation, breath is regarded as the physical anchor point for the mind, the constant intersection of body and spirit. In and out through the nose. Not controlled, just normal, natural, paying close attention to the physical nature of it. I learned to focus on two sensations: the whoosh of air in the back of my throat, and then the slow rise of my collar bones when my lungs were reaching full capacity. Whenever I felt my mind wander, I would return to those two sensations.

Yet my mind still wandered. I pondered things that I couldn't just swipe to the side. I spent time thinking about the nature of breath, what a powerful focusing tool it can be, what a natural metaphor it is. Since the minute we were born, we've been breathing. All the time. Awake, asleep. And we're always one breath (and technically a few minutes) away from death. Our breath is a tenuous connection to our consciousness, and thus our presentness. And breathing is under both voluntary and involuntary control. Through breathing, we can instantly slow our heart rate, lower our blood pressure, decrease our cortisol production, and still our mind. In and out. It's always going on, the background rhythm of every moment of meditation or confrontation, the tidal cadence of life.

The basic pattern of the weekend went like this: short instruction or discussion, twenty minutes of sitting meditation, short instruction or discussion, twenty minutes of walking meditation, repeat. Interspersed we had some breakout groups, a walking meditation to the Stupa (for some additional sitting meditation), and lots of good food and conversation.

On the last morning, we continued this pattern for a couple of hours. But after a couple of days of being unplugged and constantly stilling my mind, feeling that tranquility of soul, I began to notice an unexpected restlessness. At first I acknowledged it, didn't indulge it, yet it persisted. Eventually, I realized that I had begun to ruminate on a chain of thoughts, What's the point of all this, beyond a nice parlor trick? I tried to slip back into peaceful abiding, but things kept creeping back in. My job, my faith transition. Just acknowledge and let go. My brothers and sister, my writing. Push those to the side. I started to speed up. My kids, my wife. Swipe to the side and . . . no! I realized that this was my life flashing before me, all of my attachments, the very things that make me me, the things that make me human, passionate, fragile, empathic, frightened. And I was just pushing those away, as if they held no real value? Letting them go? The restlessness transformed instantly to anger, then to a desperate fear, like what I imagine crosses the mind of someone who arrives at their deathbed unprepared. This was me confronting the Void. Experiencing the ultimate insolvency of the ego. A glimpse of true "selflessness," not in the sense of charity, but of death. As this shadow flitted across my unstilled mind, I flailed, grasping wildly for thoughts to cling to.

And then . . . And then . . . the previous two days of meditation kicked in. What do you do with the "monkey brain", those seemingly untamable, perseverant thoughts? I acknowledged them. I considered from whence they came. I engaged briefly their attendant emotions, fantasies, discursive thoughts, subtle thoughts. And then I let them all go.

Breathe in. Breathe out. The fear subsided. Instantly. Those thoughts weren't real, anymore than my worries about what I might do after retirement, or if Ebola strikes my clinic, are real. Those thoughts and emotions aren't value-less, but they also are not substantive. Constructs of the mind.

Immediately after this experience, Greg brought us to his attention. We did a walking meditation, and then we sat for some final instruction. He then led us into an exploration of structured contemplative meditation, which is where we actually did harbor a goal, the consideration of a certain fundamental aspect of human life.

He described four aspects:

  • The Preciousness of Human Life, Free and Well-favored, or Our Good Fortune
  • Impermanence
  • Karma
  • The Futility of Samsara (the cycle of suffering)
Each of these aspects is totally engaging and I perceive potentially transformative, but I'll save that for another day. He asked us in our final meditations to first get to peaceful abiding, and then to bring into our awareness a thought, first The Preciousness of Human Life, Free and Well-favored, or Our Good Fortune. We were to ponder this, not with the intent to solve a problem, but to let our mind turn it over and see what gems were uncovered. Then we were to let those dancing lights of concrete thoughts sublimate into an essence that we could feel, but perhaps not name. Then we were to stay for a period of time that felt right, but not too long. Then come back into peaceful abiding, letting that contemplation go. 

As I got into the contemplative aspect, the thoughts that came to my mind were of my children's births, that breathtaking emergence from the womb, holding their pinkness, hearing their first cry, cuddling them between me and their loving, beautiful mother. Tears began to flow. After three days of letting go of such moments and memories, here was my chance to treasure them. My thoughts transitioned then to my parents, how they must have felt when holding me as an infant. (I don't know, maybe not, I understand I was a fussy baby.) I thought of my lone surviving grandparent, Helen, and how she must have felt when holding my father, and how her parents must have felt holding her. There was a chain of love, hope, commitment, binding me to my children, to my parents and ancestors. This was the human family, all of its strengths and weaknesses, the midwife of the human spirit.

Coming back out of that place was joyous. Judging by the responses of my fellow students, they had similarly potent experiences. Next, we contemplated impermanence. Not nearly as ecstatic, yet so profoundly beautiful. Reminded me of Steve Jobs' Stanford commencement speech: 


"No one wants to die. Even people who want to go to heaven don't want to die to get there. And yet death is the destination we all share. No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because death is very likely the single best invention of life. It is life's change agent. It clears out the old to make way for the new. Right now the new is you, but someday not too long from now, you will gradually become the old and be cleared away. Sorry to be so dramatic, but it is quite true. 
Your time is limited, so don't waste it living someone else's life. Don't be trapped by dogma — which is living with the results of other people's thinking. Don't let the noise of others' opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary."

After some final words and discussion, it was over. One final lunch, some photos and exchanges of contact info, and that was it. Back in the truck, phone on and buzzing incessantly, heading back to Denver, my family, and "real life." But what is "real life?" That is now an active question in my thinking/problem solving/ruminating/ creative/fickle mind. Hmmm. Maybe something I should meditate on. Or contemplate. Or both. Another thought: in three days of intense spiritual practice, God was never invoked. He/she/it was never dismissed, but never referenced. No dogma. No "Thou Shalts." No calls for conversion. That probably seems strange to any person from organized religion. But to me it was great. It doesn't matter if you're Buddhist or not. It's a pragmatic philosophy as much as a religion. The weekend gave me mental and physical space to explore, and to peacefully abide. Of all the things that Jesus said, my favorite remains, "The kingdom of God is within you." I think the Buddha would agree. Eyes wide open.

The trick now is of course to translate these new practices into my "real life." To that end, I've purchased my own meditation cushion and rug, set up a little sanctuary in my room. I'm trying to meditate for ten minutes every morning and night, and for one hour every weekend. Hasn't been too hard so far, because it feels so sublimely rewarding. We'll see if twenty years from now I can look back at this weekend and call it a turning point. I hope so. At the very least, it was an engaging respite from the day to day, spent with new friends and mentors in the Colorado Rockies. Totally worth it.


Finally, I feel it is appropriate to end this epistle with a photo of me and my new friend and fellow agnostic bodhisattva, Michael. Appears enlightenment doesn't dampen the irrepressible human urge to photo-bomb.

Sunday, November 30, 2014

"The Existential Altar Which Simply Is": A Quote On Contemplation By Thomas Merton


     "Let no one hope to find in contemplation an escape from conflict, from anguish, or from doubt. On the contrary, the deep, inexpressible certitude of the contemplative experience awakens a tragic anguish and opens many questions in the depths of the heart like wounds that cannot stop bleeding. For every gain in deep certitude there is a corresponding growth of superficial 'doubt.' This doubt is by no means opposed to genuine faith, but it mercilessly examines and questions the spurious 'faith' of everyday life, the human faith which is nothing but the passive acceptance of conventional opinion. This false 'faith' which is what we often live by and which we even come to confuse with our 'religion' is subjected to inexorable questioning. This torment is a kind of trial by fire in which we are compelled, by the very light of invisible truth which has reached us in the dark ray on contemplation, to examine, to doubt and finally to reject all the prejudices and conventions that we have hitherto accepted as if they were dogmas. Hence it is clear that genuine contemplation is incompatible with complacency and with smug acceptance of prejudiced opinions. It is not mere passive acquiescence in the status quo, as some would like to believe--for this would reduce it to the level of spiritual anesthesia. Contemplation is no pain-killer. What a holocaust takes place in the steady burning to ashes of old worn-out words, cliches, slogans, rationalizations! The worst of it is that even apparently holy conceptions are consumed along with all the rest. It is a terrible breaking and burning of idols, a purification of the sanctuary so that no graven thing may occupy the place that God has commanded to be left empty: the center, the existential altar which simply 'is.'
     "In the end, the contemplative suffers the anguish of realizing that he no longer knows what God is. He may or may not mercifully realize that, after all, this is a great gain, because 'God is not a what,' not a 'thing.' That is precisely one of the essential characteristics of contemplative experience. It sees that there is no 'what' that can be called God. There is 'no such thing' as God because God is neither a 'what' nor a 'thing' but a pure 'Who.' He is the 'Thou' before whom our inmost 'I' springs into awareness. He is the I Am before whom with our own most personal and inalienable voice we echo 'I am.'"
--from New Seeds of Contemplation by Thomas Merton

Thursday, November 20, 2014

Passing the Test at the Quarter Mark

Nothing figurative in the title. Last week, I had to take my American Board of Family Medicine Recertification exam--an eight hour death march. Almost four hundred questions. One terrible headache. Other than the actual marathon, this was the biggest single thing that I had to accomplish over these twelve months, a focal point of time, energy and concern. Three months in, it's been the real world coming to call, to see if I'm competent to hang my shingle, treat patients, earn a living, support my family, and have enough spare time to ponder the deeper things and blog about it, which is what I've hoped to be the main thrust of my 40th year. As long as this test has been looming, it's been tough to claim any emotional (or physical) space or time to really sink myself into a spiritual routine. But that's part of the whole trick, trying to strike a pragmatic balance in the real world while reaching out into both the infinite Cosmos and the messy chambers of my heart.

I think board certification is a good idea. Society and patients need a way to evaluate and certify a doctor's competency. Cool. I just wish there was a better way to do it, because this way stinks, in no way measuring my clinical competence. It's more about regurgitating information and outguessing the question writers. Which is a shame, because at this point, eight years into my clinical practice, I feel like I've really hit my stride as a physician, with a seasoned clinical intuition and style to match a solid knowledge base. Plus, as far as I'm concerned, the key to being a successful doctor today is not about regurgitation or being an encyclopedia. It's about knowing how to expertly diagnose and treat 80% of the problems that people present to you with, and then for the other 20%? It's about knowing what you don't know, when to be concerned, when to get help, how to access and filter accurate information, and then how to compassionately apply your clinical judgment sharpened through real-world experience to the highly specific, intimate context of that distressed patient sitting in front of you. I'm not Dr. House, but I'm a good doctor, and I wish that these tests could both certify and celebrate that.

I counted them up, and between three COMLEX exams, two USMLEs, three residency inservice exams, my initial family medicine board certification, ABIHM certification earlier this year, and now my family medicine board recertification, that this was my eleventh time taking a standardized certification test. COMLEX was the worst, as we had to answer eight hundred questions over two days, with paper and the old No. 2 pencil. Now at least we have computerized testing, which has lots of advantages, but the one major disadvantage of having to stare at a computer screen for eight straight hours. Thus the headache. With each of these exams, I've left the test wondering if I passed, only to find out a few weeks later that I actually did pretty well.

Which is probably why my overarching feeling after leaving the testing center last week was anger. I just get mad at these tests, and the sadists who write them. Their motivation appears to be to write the longest case scenarios with the most irrelevant red herrings, and then to ask the most confusingly worded question possible.

My favorite representative question on this test went something like this:
A pregnant couple comes to your office and asks you a question about what type of dog they should get. You reply that the BEST evidence indicates that which of the following is NOT true: 
A) Large dogs bite more often than small dogs
B) Between the ages of 2 and 5, most bites occur on the lower extremities.
C) A dog bite ALWAYS requires antibiotics as part of a treatment plan
D) None of the above.

What???? Seriously??? So this terrible exam question--that is evaluating nothing about my clinical acumen by asking about a scenario I have never encountered for which no amount of studying could prepare me--includes confounding specifiers and vague qualifiers that impossibly muddy the waters, and then it phrases the actual question in a way that today I still can't figure out what the hell they actually want to know. You want the BEST evidence that one of these is NOT true--come again?

Answering such a question correctly has nothing to do with whether or not I'm a good doctor, and yet it is weighted equally with the other 399 questions I had to answer that day. You hit that question seven hours into a test of similarly terrible questions, and that means clumps of hair are about to be pulled, screens punched, keyboards tossed. Or at least inner screams of rage are being unleashed.

But I kept it together, and based solely on my experiences with the other ten similar exams, I'm pretty sure I did just fine, even though it feels like I failed.

My point in including this post in my "40th Year Quest": mostly to vent, and to celebrate. Now that I'm done with the test (and the marathon), I have no major looming deadlines or events, and I can enjoy the upcoming holiday season with my fambly, and start to focus on the other more rewarding aspects of this journey: meditation, reading, service, nutrition, yoga, exercise, strengthening relationships, exploring other religions, finalizing my unified field theory equation.

It starts tomorrow with a three day meditation retreat at the Shambhala Mountain Center outside of Boulder. Time to get my zen on.








Man, If I Only Knew . . .

This Onion article kind of sums up my blogging attempts here . . .

Man, If I Only Knew Back In High School What I Still Have No Clue About

Sunday, November 16, 2014

Cocoons and Midlife Crises

"Jung believed that 'every midlife crisis is a spiritual crisis, that we are called to die to the old self (ego), the fruit of the first half of life and liberate the new man or woman within us.' Here is a hidden and misunderstood turning point of the soul, I thought. Sadly, not every person will maneuver its convoluted mazes. Would I? 
I recalled Jung's words in 'Stages of Life':
'Wholly unprepared, they embark upon the second half of life. Or are there perhaps colleges for forty-year-olds which prepare them for their coming life and its demands as the ordinary colleges introduce our young people to a knowledge of the world and of life? No, there are none. Thoroughly unprepared we take the step into the afternoon of life; worse still, we take this step with the false presupposition that our truths and ideas will serve as hitherto. But we cannot live the afternoon of life according to the programme of life's morning--for what was great in the morning will be little at evening, and what in the morning was true will at evening have become a lie.'
Jung divided life into two phases. The first phase, or 'morning' is reserved for relating and orienting to the outer world by developing the ego. The second half, or 'afternoon,' is for adapting to the inner world by developing the full and true self. The midlife transition between these two Jung likened to a difficult birth. 
The transition is difficult because it involves a real breakdown of our old spiritual and psychic structures--the old masks and personas that have served us well in the past but that no longer fit. It's anguish to come to that place in life where you know all the words but none of the music. 
In our youth we set up inner myths and stories to live by, but around the midlife junction these patterns begin to crumble. It feels to us like a collapsing of all that is, but it's a holy quaking."
"What has happened to our ability to dwell in unknowing, to live inside a question and coexist with uncertainty? Where is our willingness to incubate pain and let it birth something new? What has happened to patient unfolding, to endurance? These things are what form the ground of waiting. And if you look carefully, you'll see that they're also the seedbed of creativity and growth--what allows us to do the daring and to break through to newness . . . Creativity flourishes not in certainty but in questions . . . yet the seduction is always security rather than venturing . . . When it comes to religion today, we tend to be long on butterflies and short on cocoons."
--from When The Heart Waits, by Sue Monk Kidd


"If I decide to become a butterfly . . . what do I do?"

"Watch me," came the reply. "I'm making a cocoon. 
It looks like I'm hiding, I know, but a cocoon is no escape. 
It's an in-between house where the change takes place . . . 
During the change, it will seem . . . that nothing is happening, 
but the butterfly is already becoming. 
It just takes time."

--from Hope For The Flowers by Trina Paulus

Friday, November 14, 2014

Huxley, the Eternal Ground, and Other Quotes

"It is because we don't know Who we are, because we are unaware that the Kingdom of Heaven is within us, that we behave in the generally silly, the often insane, the sometimes criminal ways that are so characteristically human. We are saved, we are liberated and enlightened, by perceiving the hitherto unperceived good that is already within us, by returning to our eternal Ground and remaining where, without knowing it, we have always been."--Aldous Huxley, The Perennial Philosophy



I've been reading a book called, "What Is Enlightenment?" that contains a large excerpt from The Perennial Philosophy by Aldous Huxley, who's most famous for writing "A Brave New World." My previous image of Huxley was that of a cantankerous intellectual and pessimist, and that's partly true, but not at all a fair description of this intellectual giant. Later in life, even as a professed agnostic, he became deeply interested in understanding the spiritual dimension--famously by experimenting with mind-altering drugs. But much beyond that, he surveyed all the major world religions, systems of thought, and mystical traditions and tried to sort out their commonalities, describing "the eternal Ground" beneath all of them. That's what The Perennial Philosophy refers to:
"The metaphysic that recognises a divine Reality substantial to the world of things and lives and minds; the psychology that finds in the soul something similar to, or even identical with, divine Reality; the ethic that places man's final end in the knowledge of the immanent and transcendent Ground of all being — the thing is immemorial and universal. 
Rudiments of the Perennial Philosophy may be found among the traditionary lore of primitive peoples in every region of the world, and in its fully developed forms it has a place in every one of the higher religions. A version of this Highest Common Factor in all preceding and subsequent theologies was first committed to writing more than twenty-five centuries ago, and since that time the inexhaustible theme has been treated again and again, from the standpoint of every religious tradition and in all the principal languages of Asia and Europe. 
If one is not oneself a sage or saint, the best thing one can do, in the field of metaphysics, is to study the works of those who were, and who, because they had modified their merely human mode of being, were capable of a more than merely human kind and amount of knowledge."
That's good stuff. That's a bit of what I'm trying to do on this 40th year quest. I've found some other pithy quotes from Huxley, shared below. One final thought about Huxley: he died on Nov 22, 1963, the same day as C.S. Lewis, and of course the assassination of JFK. This was also just as the Beatles rose to prominence. I can't help but think that, had their trajectories intersected more substantially, he and John Lennon would have been best buds, not to mention sharing the same optician.


"The spiritual journey does not consist in arriving at a new destination where a person gains what he did not have, or becomes what he is not. It consists in the dissipation of one's own ignorance concerning one's self and life, and the gradual growth of that understanding which begins the spiritual awakening. The finding of God is a coming to one's self."--Aldous Huxley












Friday, October 31, 2014

Marathon


I ran the Denver Rock N Roll Marathon last week. Upon finishing, I cried like a baby--partly in relief, triumph, and exhaustion, but mostly in pain. I staggered through the chute. I collapsed to the grass. I could barely move for fifteen minutes, or the next morning, or the next. But I finished the darn thing. Due to a bum hamstring, I was not in the peak physical condition I had envisioned. My time (4:04 hrs) was impossibly far from my goal of 3:30 hrs, which had seemed tantalizingly within reach only weeks previously.

But I finished it. It is done.

The marathon was the overarching physical goal for this 40th year spiritual quest, the goal around which all other goals have revolved, in preparation, excitement, and focus. Mind, body, spirit are all one thing, right? And so like other spiritual practices, I anticipated that extreme physical stress would create the conditions for spiritual enlightenment.

Except enlightenment didn't come in any definable way. No pillar of light, burst of inspiration, or burning bush. As I limped to the finish, the only thought was survival, the only sensation pain. The emotions were mixed: pride, disappointment, relief, loneliness, and empathy for my fellow runners. My wife, who had heroically completed the half marathon with a bad IT band just a little bit earlier, met me at the finish line. I leaned feebly into her, gasping, and collapsed. No angels that day, but I did have her.

For marathon runners, I understand it's not always this way, but often it is. This was my first one, and I've gathered that many have had similar experiences. The most dominant feeling at the finish line is pain. But unlike other physical and emotional pains I've had to endure, this time I was choosing with every step to prolong my agony. I could have stopped. But I make silly objectives like "never stop," and so I refused, against better judgment, to let my nervy clenched grinding numb legs stop moving. At one point, when I felt like I couldn't go a step further--and simultaneously realized with a gulp of terror that I still had eight miles to go--when my time goal had become unreachable and was dropping precipitously further away by the minute, I thought that, Well, if I'm going to be in agony, I might as well get it over with quicker, and the only way to do that would be to speed up, right? But I couldn't do it. My legs were in some sort of involuntary rhythm, their pace fixed. I couldn't speed them up or stop them either. It was close to an out of body experience.

What was carrying me forward? Some silly goal? Pride? Fear? Why was I doing this?

To frame my motivations, I have to go back to the slopes of Kilimanjaro. In February of 2012, Elizabeth and I joined a trek up Kilimanjaro, to raise money for the Sega Girls School in Tanzania. The invitation to join came while I was recovering from kidney cancer, and Kili was on my bucket list. A perfect combination of factors inspired us to say yes: a brush with mortality that begged for celebration, a bucket list item, a worthy cause we believed in, a physical challenge to motivate our exercise routines, and overall a joint outrageous goal that we sensed would bring us together and help organize and focus all of our physical, financial, and social activities for a solid year. This occurred not long after we left the LDS Church, and we needed something to aim for.

It worked. We had a fantastic year preparing. We hiked throughout the winter in Colorado, saved money, bought gear and plane tickets, and raised $10,000 through a 5K race and an online drive (we paid our own way, and all of the fundraising went directly to the school).

When we got to Africa and met our team, we were by far the youngest people on the trek and we had the added advantage of being from Colorado, when most of the rest were from sea level. We were in great shape. At the base of that monolithic mountain, the sky seemed the limit. The hike went perfectly, until on day four, at our 14,100 ft acclimatization camp at spectacular Mawenzi Tarn, I developed a headache, then a cough, and then within 24 hours I became severely ill.  My oxygen level dropped to 73%; my heart rate was 130 at rest. I borrowed a stethoscope and heard wet crackles throughout both lungs, the kind I've only heard before on patients with end stage congestive heart failure. I couldn't speak a full sentence without being winded.

I knew the score, but in a somewhat clouded frame of mind, I protested. Elizabeth spoke wisdom: "Our kids won't care if you touch the top of this mountain, but they will care if you die trying." I threw in the towel. I was carried off the mountain on a stretcher, on oxygen. Due to a pinky swear that Elizabeth and I had made prior to the trek, she continued onward, and eventually triumphed.

But while she went up, I went down. The cure for high altitude pulmonary edema is simple: get off the mountain. At a hospital at the base, my chest X-ray showed a left sided white out, but my oxygen climbed back to 93%. I recuperated in the hotel for three days while the rest of the group completed the climb, me staring mournfully at the summit that eluded me. So close but yet so far. The trip was still spectacular, but I left with the knowledge that my body had failed me at the doorstep of my dream.

And so, when I pulled my hamstring three weeks before this race during a fifteen mile training run, I felt intense disappointment. I also felt embarrassed, and afraid. On one level, I knew that it wasn't my fault, and I knew it didn't really matter in any ultimate way. This was not a referendum on my character. Injuries happen, and they happen more often to forty year old bodies. Plus, nobody really cared about this marathon but me. Nobody would think less of me if I didn't meet my goal or complete the race, and besides, if they did, then what would I care?

But on a physical and visceral level, this hurt. I was getting older. When would I ever be this young, or this fit, or this motivated again? I feel that more and more now: the ticking clock. I don't really fear it, but I find I kind of resent it. Who is this guy Father Time who's trying to tell me what I can't do? Mostly, I feared that if I didn't complete this marathon, I would be establishing an irreversible pattern for these bucket list goals: my body failing me at the threshold. A willing heart, but weak flesh.

All of that circulated through my mind at the starting line. I had rested my hamstring, done yoga, stretching, physical therapy, dry needling (ouch!), massage, ice, heat, ibuprofen, and mostly rest, and then for the final week I had done nothing. Trust your cardio fitness, my runner brother and friends told me, but rest your legs. You can't run without two legs.

So on a chilly autumn morning before sunrise, as we waited in a ridiculously long port-a-potty line, I tested my leg. Stretched, twisted, jumped. It felt pretty good. But because I hadn't run in a week, I didn't know how it would respond to running. I made it to my corral just prior to the gun, and then I was off with the mob. My strategy was to take the first two miles a full two minutes slower than my planned pace so that I could ease into it. But in the thick of the crowd, that seemed way too slow. I wanted to get out ahead of some people. I was feeling good. I picked up the pace. No problem. Then we hit the first hill at about the 3.5 mile mark.

Tweak. I felt my left hamstring grab. Just a bit, but a flood of worry washed over me. I had over 22 miles to go. I'd spent a lot of time thinking about the psychology of this moment, how would I respond if the injury reared its ugly head? I was somewhat ready. I backed off the pace, I focused on maintaining an even stride. I "breathed into" my legs. Yoga breaths. Imagined lava orange fire seeping healing power into my hammy. It seemed to work. The grab was still there, but manageable, and once I got to the top of the hill, I felt it relax.

So I picked up the pace again. So far so good.  At mile seven, after another small hill, I felt it grab again, this time in my calf, too. More breathing. Seemed okay. At mile ten I felt a new and ominous pain in my left anterior hip. I suddenly had a hitch in my gait. Not good. For the next mile I considered, with a sense of utter failure, that I might have to bail at the halfway point. (The course loops back on itself at the half point. By the way, the course was totally amazing. A tour of all things Denver: Civic Center, Convention Center, Auraria, Pepsi Center, Broncos' Stadium, Coors Field, Downtown, City Park and Zoo, Capital Building, and Wash Park.) But as I approached the congested mid portion of the course, the crowd swelled, the bands rocked, people cheered, and on the flat stretch my legs felt almost okay. I was at the halfway point. All I had to do was . . . do this all over again. Tough, but doable. I pushed on.

By the time I got to City Park, I was in substantial pain. Up until that point, I had been within striking distance of my desired pace. But it got away from me in a hurry. Instead of passing people, now I was being passed. Fortunately or not, my Garmin GPS watch ran out of juice at that point, so I no longer had the direct awareness of my decreasing pace, but neither did I have that burr in my saddle. By mile eighteen, as the course looped back toward the central area and crossed the capitol steps, I was in severe pain. Eight more miles to go. I referenced my training runs in my head. That's not so long, I thought. I can't quit now. Then I'd have to do this again some day. Better just to bite the bullet and grind this baby out. I can do this. But remember: never stop.

Never stop, indeed. The next eight miles were endless, and became pure agony. The pain in my hip passed from severe to excruciating, and I couldn't figure out why. Probably because I was compensating in some way for my hamstring, thus putting unexpected stresses on my hip flexors. But how the hell was that going to help me now? This is the point where things became involuntary and clouded. My feet actually went numb. Why? I didn't have a clue. I began to feel emotional. I tried lamely to encourage the other runners I encountered, some having pulled out to walk, other trudging on past me. But I sounded less like a cheerleader and more like a mortally wounded soldier whispering to his comrades to press on, and tell Lizzy I always loved her.

The killer thing about it was that it lasted so long. It seemed like a hundred miles. It was late morning now and the sun was hot. I had no idea of my time. People lined the streets and cheered generically (which I truly appreciated), but no one actually cared about me, knew my name, could fathom my motivations, could understand my pain and disappointment, could applaud my tenacity, or cajole me to man up and press on. The bystanders cheered for the human race, for the multitudes, for the spectacle of sport and achievement, but not for me. Except for one person, a beautiful woman I hoped had survived her race and would be waiting for me at finish line, a line that I began to think may be fiction.

Eventually, the crowd and band noise began to swell. The buildings grew taller, and I could see the finish. I had imagined at this point I would feel an adrenaline surge, but that tank was dry. As I rounded the final corner, I heard my name for the first time: "Mark! Good job, Mark!" I turned around but couldn't find her in the crowd. I staggered across the finish and for the first time in 26.2 miles, I stopped.

I frightened myself by the strange gasping quality of my breathing, punctuated by sobs. It all seemed rather dramatic, except that in the melee of other finishers, not a soul among thousands was paying attention. This was what Mr. Mark Foster looked like in extremis, maxed out and beyond, and I was alone in the boisterous sea of humanity. I propped myself up against a fence until Elizabeth came limping up towards me. I leaned into her and wept, separated by bars.

After that we made our way to grass, where I collapsed to the ground and lay still, nearly unable to move my rigid joints when I tried to rise fifteen minutes later.  Brain sending signals, limbs not responding. Then the mile long walk back to the car, then home for a shower and an afternoon of football and laying motionless on the couch.

To my great surprise, I have recovered much quicker than I thought. It's now two weeks later, and I've got minimal pain, even went on a 3 mile jog yesterday. Hot tubs have been good to me. Yoga, too.

And so here's the obvious metaphor: Life is a race, man. There's a ticking clock. We race together. We race alone. The distance is arbitrary. (Favorite sign on the course: "Why 26.2 miles? Because 26.3 is CRAZY!") We invent the goal and busy ourselves with achieving it. We move the goal posts when our physical limitations demand it. If we're lucky, we may have one person among billions who cares as deeply for us as for herself, who will call out our name at the finish, and hold onto us when we can no longer stand.

And when we've finally pushed ourselves to the absolute extreme, when we call out to some deep inner well of soul power that is as vulnerable as it is strong, we only hope that it echoes back to us at the finish line, "Well done, dude. I love you."






Dalai Lama Quote: 18 Rules For Living

I've found great wisdom in quotes from the Dalai Lama, delivered with simplicity, compassion, and humor. This is a true messenger. Let's give heed to his word. Number 11 is my favorite. And number 5.  And 17 and 18 . . . Good stuff.


At the turn of this century, the Dalai Lama issued the following statement and eighteen rules for living:

Of the many problems we face today, some are natural calamities and must be accepted and faced with equanimity. Others, however, are of our own making, created by misunderstanding, and can be corrected. One such type arises from the conflict of ideologies, political or religious, when people fight each other for petty ends, losing sight of the basic humanity that binds us all together as a single human family. We must remember that the different religions, ideologies, and political systems of the world are meant for human beings to achieve happiness. We must not lose sight of this fundamental goal and at no time should we place means above ends; the supremacy of humanity over matter and ideology must always be maintained.

By far the greatest single danger facing humankind – in fact, all living beings on our planet – is the threat of nuclear destruction. I need not elaborate on this danger, but I would like to appeal to all the leaders of the nuclear powers who literally hold the future of the world in their hands, to the scientists and technicians who continue to create these awesome weapons of destruction, and to all the people at large who are in a position to influence their leaders: I appeal to them to exercise their sanity and begin to work at dismantling and destroying all nuclear weapons. We know that in the event of a nuclear war there will be no victors because there will be no survivors! Is it not frightening just to contemplate such inhuman and heartless destruction? And, is it not logical that we should remove the cause for our own destruction when we know the cause and have both the time and the means to do so? Often we cannot overcome our problems because we either do not know the cause or, if we understand it, do not have the means to remove it. This is not the case with the nuclear threat. ~ Dalai Lama

Eighteen Rules For Living:

Rule 1. Take into account that great love and great achievements involve great risk.
Rule 2. When you lose, don’t lose the lesson
Rule 3. Follow the three Rs: 1. Respect for self 2. Respect for others 3. Responsibility for all your actions.
Rule 4. Remember that not getting what you want is sometimes a wonderful stroke of luck.
Rule 5. Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
Rule 6. Don’t let a little dispute injure a great friendship.
Rule 7. When you realize you’ve made a mistake, take immediate steps to correct it.
Rule 8. Spend some time alone every day.
Rule 9. Open your arms to change, but don’t let go of your values.
Rule 10. Remember that silence is sometimes the best answer.
Rule 11. Live a good, honorable life. Then when you get older and think back, you’ll be able to enjoy it a second time.
Rule 12. A loving atmosphere in your home is the foundation for your life.
Rule 13. In disagreements with loved ones, deal only with the current situation. Don’t bring up the past.
Rule 14. Share your knowledge. It’s a way to achieve immortality.
Rule 15. Be gentle with the earth.
Rule 16. Once a year, go someplace you’ve never been before.
Rule 17. Remember that the best relationship is one in which your love for each other exceeds your need for each other.
Rule 18. Judge your success by what you had to give up in order to get it.

Mandela: "As I Walked Out The Door . . ."


Friday, October 17, 2014

The Demon-Haunted World: A Review

I just finished reading Carl Sagan's final book, The Demon-Haunted World: Science As A Candle in the Dark.

"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."
--Carl Sagan, from The Demon Haunted World.

I'm on an intentional spiritual quest to find meaning and purpose after Mormonism. A big part of my program this year involves reading. Lots of reading, all sorts of books. This was first on my list, and I'm going to review it here.

The Demon-Haunted World was published in 1995, shortly before Sagan's death in 1996. As I read it, there was the sense that this was his last, best effort to convey to us (and to history) the central passion of his life: the overwhelming power of the scientific method to illuminate real truth and dispel myth. Many of the chapters were adapted from other articles and essays that he had previously written, so the book at times feels a little scattered, unfocused. Also, at times he comes off somewhat pretentious, erudite, dismissive (no matter how justifiably) of the cherished experiences or feelings of that vast majority of the human race. But at welcome intervals, he tempers that attitude with expressions of genuine humility and even affection for the rest of us who have a hard time telling just what we're seeing as we gaze through the glass darkly.

Carl Sagan has long been a hero to me. After spending time with him in this book, he's moved further up my hero's totem pole. For the most part, he speaks in the languages I most appreciate: curiosity, clarity, rationality, integrity, skepticism and real truth. I have vague memories of the first Cosmos series in the late 1970s: "Billions and billions" is the famous (and inaccurate) line. One of my all time favorite books and movies is Contact. Recently, my admiration for him has been renewed through the new Cosmos series, hosted by Neil deGrasse Tyson, a former student of Sagan.

The homage paid to Sagan by the new show is touching and deserved. Sagan was a world-renowned scientist in his own right, but his ability to articulate, captivate, animate, persuade is what defines his legacy today. To do what he did--speaking hard truths about scientific discovery, dispelling myths and superstitions, and making it understandable and persuasive--takes courage, intelligence, savvy, and also a sort of meta-perspective on the nature of humanity, a rare ability to see beyond the muddy waters of the moment and point himself and thus others towards a higher understanding of our place in the universe. He's been called the greatest science communicator of all time, and so I think it makes good sense to pay attention to his last best effort to share his hard-gained wisdom.

The title "The Demon Haunted World" sets the tone for the book. There are no real demons in our world. There are only people. And yet from the dawn of the human race, humans have imagined demons up, been haunted, persecuted, driven mad by them--or by ghosts, witches, Big Foot, UFOs, aliens, or cursed by gods and devils. But this belief in the supernatural and pseudoscience, our ceding of control to imaginary forces, is not just a charming relic of the past. It's a terrifying, ubiquitous, and frighteningly contemporary feature of human life, all based on fear and fantasy. The Witch Trials of Europe and Salem, the Spanish Inquisition, the Holocaust and the wars that now rage in the Middle East and elsewhere, have religion, irrational fanaticism and superstition at their root.

The first two chapters discuss how the rigorous application of the scientific method can dispel myth and superstition, how it can light "a candle in the dark." Then, in order to illustrate his point, Sagan launches into a discussion about aliens and alien abductions. This caught me by surprise. I've never taken those stories very seriously. But as this book was written twenty years ago, apparently there was somewhat of an epidemic of alien abductions in the 1980s. The statistics are pretty alarming. In 1994, a Gallup poll showed that up to 3 million Americans believed they had been abducted by aliens. A lot of the stories had similar features, and usually involved some sort of sexual assault. Support groups, conferences, societies, and an alarming amount of psychologists gave enhanced credibility to the stories. It was accepted as a fact of life by many: aliens would come at night and adbuct you, and there was nothing you could do about it. How could so many people have the same experiences with such strikingly similar features?

This is a question that Sagan dismantles easily. He asks in return, how could there be such a stunning increase in abductions, and such an absolute dearth of actual evidence? In the end, all of these tens of thousands of abduction stories have one thing in common: they are entirely subjective. Sure, some people present with evidence of bruises, or missing gaps of time on their watches. But there are many ways to be bruised, many ways to reset a watch. What is lacking is any sort of tangible, reproducible, independently verifiable evidence.

(Sidenote: I imagine that one reason Sagan spends such time deconstructing alien abductions is that, due to his extensive involvement in the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) program, he was often unfairly associated with these stories. He puts those suppositions to rest. He does believe in extraterrestrial intelligence, merely based on the unfathomable size and age of the universe and the number of likely inhabitable planets. But he doesn't believe any of these life forms has yet contacted earth, much less stealthily invaded our atmosphere within the last fifty years and stolen us away in the night to examine our genitals.)

Saga takes the same approach in dealing with pervasive folk legends about UFOs, crop circles, satanic cults, and divine visitations. Each superstition is evaluated fairly, and the objective evidence that speaks strongly against their veracity is weighed against the subjective testimonies of those who swear on their souls that it's true. When fairly weighed, those scales always tip towards hoax or delusion.

One of the most famous chapters is "The Dragon In My Garage," an allegory about how rational beings should skeptically evaluate truth claims that are not falsifiable. The story goes like this: I tell you there is a dragon in my garage. You doubt my claim, and ask me to show you. I say, Sorry, can't show you, because it's invisible. You say, Let's spread flour on the floor so I can see it's footprints. I say, Sorry, no footprints, because this dragon floats. You suggest we spray paint it to make it visible. I say, Sorry, this an incorporeal dragon, so paint won't stick. And so on.

I've made an incredible claim. You've suggested ways to prove it true. But I've fended off every attempt by telling you a more fantastical way to evade that proof. Eventually a simple question arises, as Sagan states: "Now, what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon . . . and no dragon at all? If there is no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experiment that would count against it, what does it mean to say that my dragon exists? Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at all the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof . . . are worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of any evidence, on my say-so." (p 171)


Another essential chapter is "The Fine Art Of Baloney Detection," Sagan's famous toolkit for avoiding logical and rhetorical fallacies when evaluating truth claims. Here is a great link to a website that summarizes it. Sagan gives us a way to look at various tactics that are often used to support a fantastical truth claim, or at least to stifle a doubter's disbelief. Ad hominem attacks, false dichotomies, straw men, suppressed evidence, and mostly appeals to ignorance and appeals to authority: these strategies form the playbook for FAIR Mormon and pretty much any other dogmatic institution's apologetic arm. When I confront a truth claim, I want to answer this question: "How can I know for sure this is true?" But dogmatic organizations will not address such a question--they are existentially threatened by them. Instead, their apologists pose their own question: "How can we make the evaluation of this spurious truth claim, which we know if our heads and hearts to be baseless but which if definitively repudiated would undermine the authority of the whole organization . . . how can we make this so confusing that an average reader will give up trying to find out whether or not it is actually true, and instead fall back to their leader's appeal to just accept it on faith, fear or feeling?"

I have another critique of this book, which I think illuminates some limitations of Sagan's scientific world view. He references a few times the biologic basis of mental illnesses, and the triumph of science in developing the efficacious drugs used to treat them. On one level, I can give him a pass here, because this is not his area of expertise, and because twenty years later we know a lot more than we used to.  From his perch in 1994, the secrets of the brain appeared to have been unlocked, just like the secrets of the stars and the atoms had been. He trusted the "scientists" in authority who produced the DSM and developed the drugs, like Prozac, that had been recently introduced to the market. But man, do I have a book I'd like Carl to read now: Anatomy of an Epidemic by Robert Whitaker, which I've written about previously. In my opinion, the current state of psychiatry and the psychopharmaceutical ideology that supports it, represents a failure of science to correct itself. This is not to say that there is not some biological basis for symptoms of emotional and cognitive distress, or that medications are not helpful for some people in some situations.

But Sagan's Baloney Detection Meter would go bezerk if evaluating the current practice of biopsychiatry. The mental health industry is fundamentally compromised by Big Pharma money, and underwritten by people's undying desire to believe in magic pills and quick fixes. Much of the research is corrupt or incomplete. Evidence is suppressed, or cherry-picked. Dissenting opinions are attacked personally instead of objectively. It is a terribly complex issue, and most people--doctors, patients, families affected by it--are simply trying to do the best they can. But in this instance, unexamined faith in science, not religion, and psychiatry's unholy marriage to profit motive, has caused net harm to society.

But in a round about way, even my critique here is a expression of faith in science. I believe Carl would agree with me, or would at least be open to re-evaluating the evidence and our conclusions. That is a fundamental part of the scientific method: be open to new evidence that would challenge your old assumptions. Reversing the damage of psychopharmacology, inverting the current paradigm, will require a renewed application of the scientific method to our broad societal assumptions about mental health. If I'm wrong, if the evidence proves otherwise, I'll admit it, and adopt the evidence-based model. So let's try it. Let's have a real, objective societal conversation about it, and follow where the evidence leads.

Other chapters of note:
  • "Obsessed With Reality":  Sagan shares a fascinating story that occurred in Australia in 1988, where a man with a supposed brain injury began channeling a wandering spirit named Carlos. Carlos came with a "great lesson" to teach humanity. He filled the Sydney Opera House with believers, only to reveal the next week on national television that it was all a hoax meant to show people how gullible they can be. 
  • "The Path To Freedom": He tells us, through the story of Frederick Douglas, the incredible power of books and literacy to transmit ideas across time and space, to level the playing field in a democracy, and to propel lives from the abyss of physical or mental slavery to the pinnacle of freedom of thought and expression.
  • "When Scientists Know Sin": He discusses what can happen when science is unbridled by ethics, or by considerations of the consequences of its discoveries and innovations. This is told through the story of the development of the hydrogen bomb, and how that unnecessary weapon led to the escalation of the cold war and the near annihilation of our species.
  • "The Marriage Of Skepticism And Wonder": He shares how science unfortunately can turn some people into crotchety party poopers in the fiesta of life. Yet he argues that true science should evoke a sense of reverence and awe, similar to religion. I like this quote: "At the heart of science is an essential balance between two seemingly contradictory attitudes--an openness to new ideas, no matter how bizarre or counterintuitive, and the most ruthlessly skeptical scrutiny of all ideas, old and new. This is how deep truths are winnowed from deep nonsense. The collective enterprise of creative thinking and skeptical thinking keeps the field on track." (p 304)
Finally, I want to highlight a few quotes regarding the dichotomy of certainty/uncertainty, seeing as that's the title of this blog and my 40th year quest. Here's the question: Does the rigorous application of the scientific method allow us to arrive at any measure of certainty in an uncertain universe?

Sagan quotes Rene Descartes, who said, "I did not imitate the skeptics who doubt only for doubting's sake, and pretend to be always undecided; on the contrary, my whole intention was to arrive a certainty, and to dig away the drift and the sand until I reached the rock or the clay beneath." This reminds me of a favorite quote by Sir Francis Bacon: "If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end in doubts; but if he will be content to begin with doubts, he shall end in certainties."

But, Rene and Francis, is that true? Will science and skepticism, in the end, lead us to certainty? Of course both of those quotes were offered a few centuries before we discovered relativity and quantum uncertainty, principles which govern the universe at the cosmic and subatomic levels in apparent defiance of Newton. Here's what Carl has to say about it:

"Humans may crave absolute certainty; they may aspire to it, they may pretend, as partisans of certain religions do, to have attained it. But the history of science--by far the most successful claim to knowledge accessible to humans--teaches that the most we can hope for is successive improvement in our understanding, learning from our mistakes, an asymptotic approach to the Universe, but with the proviso that absolute certainty will always elude us. We will always be mired in error. The most each generation can hope for is to reduce the error bars a little . . . 
"One of the great commandments of science is, 'Mistrust arguments from authority.' This independence of science, it occasional unwillingness to accept conventional wisdom, makes it dangerous to doctrines less self-critical, or with pretensions to certitude.
"Because science carries us toward an understanding of how the world is, rather than how we would wish it to be, its findings may not in all cases be immediately comprehensible or satisfying. It may take a little work to restructure our mindsets. Some of science is very simple. When it gets complicated, that's usually because the world is complicated--or because we're complicated. When we shy away from it because it seems too difficult . . . we surrender the ability to take charge of our future . . .
"But when we pass beyond the barrier, when the findings and methods of science get through to us, when we understand and put this knowledge to use, many feel deep satisfaction . . . how gratifying it is when we get it, when obscure terms suddenly take on meaning, when we grasp what all the fuss is about, when deep wonders are revealed.
"In its encounter with Nature, science invariably elicits a sense of reverence and awe. The very act of understanding is a celebration of joining, merging, even if on a very modest scale, with the magnificence of the Cosmos. And the cumulative worldwide buildup of knowledge over time converts science into something only a little short of a transnational, transgenerational meta-mind.
"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual." (p 28-29)
Wow. That's what I'm looking for. Wisdom. Humility. Clarity. Beauty. Truth.

I'll close with one more famous quote from this book that demands to be read:
"One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It's simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we've been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back." 
Thank you, Carl. This is a book that deserves a prominent place on any seeker's shelf. But be careful, fellow seekers! It's the sort of book that, when its tools are applied conscientiously, may cause some heavily-laden shelves to crack . . .